<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you being greenwashed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.liberationbc.org/2009/07/are-you-being-greenwashed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.liberationbc.org/2009/07/are-you-being-greenwashed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://blog.liberationbc.org/2009/07/are-you-being-greenwashed/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.liberationbc.org/?p=856#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Check out happy meat here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUkHkyy4uqw

All the animals are killed in the same industrialized slaughterhouses and they all face the same cruel end.  If by happy meat you mean animals that are happy to have every single one of their family and friends killed and then to be killed themselves, then I guess you are eating &quot;happy&quot; meat.   Happy meat, like Happy Meals is just another marketing jargon.

Whether or not the animals you eat lived a &quot;happy&quot; life has nothing to do with how much impact they have on the environment.  We raise and kill 50 billion animals per year for food.  That has a huge impact on the environment no matter how &quot;happy&quot; the animals may be.  Rainforests still are cleared to make flat land for cows to graze in.  The animals still produce a huge amount of feces and urine, they still need to be transported to slaughter, the slaughterhouses are a huge waste of resources and energy.  Tons of blood and heads and eyeballs are still dumped into the land and waters.  And if the parts are rendered, more trucks are needed to transport them to the rendering plant which uses huge amounts of energy.

Reducing consumption by eating lower in the food chain is the only way you are going to effectively reduce your footprint.  Eating &quot;happy&quot; meat is not the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out happy meat here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUkHkyy4uqw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUkHkyy4uqw</a></p>
<p>All the animals are killed in the same industrialized slaughterhouses and they all face the same cruel end.  If by happy meat you mean animals that are happy to have every single one of their family and friends killed and then to be killed themselves, then I guess you are eating &#8220;happy&#8221; meat.   Happy meat, like Happy Meals is just another marketing jargon.</p>
<p>Whether or not the animals you eat lived a &#8220;happy&#8221; life has nothing to do with how much impact they have on the environment.  We raise and kill 50 billion animals per year for food.  That has a huge impact on the environment no matter how &#8220;happy&#8221; the animals may be.  Rainforests still are cleared to make flat land for cows to graze in.  The animals still produce a huge amount of feces and urine, they still need to be transported to slaughter, the slaughterhouses are a huge waste of resources and energy.  Tons of blood and heads and eyeballs are still dumped into the land and waters.  And if the parts are rendered, more trucks are needed to transport them to the rendering plant which uses huge amounts of energy.</p>
<p>Reducing consumption by eating lower in the food chain is the only way you are going to effectively reduce your footprint.  Eating &#8220;happy&#8221; meat is not the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://blog.liberationbc.org/2009/07/are-you-being-greenwashed/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.liberationbc.org/?p=856#comment-392</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Greenwashed&quot; article I linked to has references to the Carnegie Mellon report and the UN report, both of which have information about the environmental impacts of even the most free range meat. In general, if you want to let animals run around they eat more and use more land. Plus cows produce more methane when they eat grass than if they eat corn. You can find links to more information on our environment page: http://liberationbc.org/issues/environment.

And there is no such thing as &quot;happy&quot; meat. Slaughter is never &quot;happy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Greenwashed&#8221; article I linked to has references to the Carnegie Mellon report and the UN report, both of which have information about the environmental impacts of even the most free range meat. In general, if you want to let animals run around they eat more and use more land. Plus cows produce more methane when they eat grass than if they eat corn. You can find links to more information on our environment page: <a href="http://liberationbc.org/issues/environment" rel="nofollow">http://liberationbc.org/issues/environment</a>.</p>
<p>And there is no such thing as &#8220;happy&#8221; meat. Slaughter is never &#8220;happy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://blog.liberationbc.org/2009/07/are-you-being-greenwashed/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.liberationbc.org/?p=856#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Can you please provide some sources for the claims you&#039;re making?  I&#039;m not being smart-alecky, I&#039;m actually interested for my research.  Need some backup for the claim that even &quot;happy&quot; meat is detrimental to the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please provide some sources for the claims you&#8217;re making?  I&#8217;m not being smart-alecky, I&#8217;m actually interested for my research.  Need some backup for the claim that even &#8220;happy&#8221; meat is detrimental to the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
