November, 2009

...now browsing by month

 

Across the internet: a selection from the past week

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

This past week is full of Thanksgiving-related posts and news, since Thursday was American Thanksgiving. Probably the most exciting Thanksgiving development was Martha Stewart’s Vegetarian Thanksgiving. With Martha Stewart and Ellen both championing the end of factory farming and a move towards vegetarianism and veganism, there might just be hope for the future.

Vegan Soapbox: It’s OK To Care About Animals

PETA: NBC Nixes Family-Friendly Thanksgiving Day Parade Ad

Laurie David: Eating Animals: Caring Is Not A Zero-Sum Game

Making Hay: What’s Your Thanksgiving Tradition?

Vegan Etsy: Eating Animals: Words / Meaning – the third chapter of the new book by Jonathan Safran Foer

Ecorazzi.com: Exclusive: “Eating Animals” Author Jonathan Safran Foer Celebrates For The Turkeys

Foodconsumer.org: Agriculture Proposal Gives Meat To The Poor–To Get Rid Of It

Animal Blawg: More Human than Humans

Vegansaurus: Defensive Omnivore BINGO!

GirlieGirl Army: Surviving Thanksgiving Amongst Carnivores

Martha Stewart: Vegetarian Thanksgiving

Digging Through the Dirt: Gore Walks an Odd Environmental Walk

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Thanksgiving Dilemmas: Family, Tension, Killing, and Compassion

Paul Shapiro: Attacking the Messenger: Big Ag’s Attempt to Misdirect Attention from Its Own Problems

Huffington Post: For The Love Of Turkeys: A Real Thanksgiving

Business Insider: How Your Thanksgiving Turkey Gets Made

The Vegan Dietician: A Thanksgiving Prayer for the Animals

Mother Jones: Extremely Dead and Incredibly Gross

Animal Place Sanctuary: Happy Thanksgiving!!

NPR: The 10 Best Cookbooks Of 2009 (one of them is vegan!)

Digging Through the Dirt: Turducken: When Killing 1 Animal Just Isn’t Enough

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Animal Rights and Gratefulness, for the Animals and for Each Other

Huffington Post: Top 10 (Recent) Developments On Factory Farming And Vegetarianism

Lies of the Egg Industry

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

It’s no secret that, having researched “free range” and “organic” farming, I am less than impressed and feel that most consumers have been thoroughly deceived as to what such terms mean. Most people aren’t aware that “cage-free” chickens usually can’t go outside, that “free range” has no legal meaning, and again, doesn’t require that chickens have access to the outdoors, or that even “organic”, which is the highest standard there is, requires routine mutilation and death.  (More here.)

That said, do I believe that it is better to live like this…

freerangeeggs

…than like this?

Battery_Cage_01

Of course I do.  Both types of farming result in considerable and unnecessary suffering for the animals involved, but one is obviously worse than the other.  Most reasonably sane people will be able to agree on this last point.

That brings us to the United Egg Producers, who, like most egg producers on the North American continent, are very concerned with keeping chickens in battery cages.  Why is that?  Because they CARE about chickens.  Who knew?

freerange-uep2Witness the profound absurdity of a company insisting that free-range chickens, who in the very best of circumstances, DO go outside, won’t have any form of shelter and will have to stand around in the rain.

"I miss my warm dry cage, Dolly!"

"I miss my warm dry cage, Dolly!"

Same thing with this brilliant attempt at fooling the public.  Message to the public: apparently egg producers think you are unbelievably stupid.

freerange-uep1Apparently egg producers also think chickens are unbelievably stupid, and will stand around waiting to get picked off by predators.  I guess they haven’t read the studies which demonstrate that chickens actually have different ways to communicate where a predator is coming from, as well as how much of a threat it is.

One more:

freerange-uep3As if chickens lay their eggs for us to eat.  Even life in a battery cage does not destroy the chicken’s desire to create a nest for the babies she expects to have.  Because battery cages are entirely barren, however, they don’t generally have anything to build with–no straw, sticks, leaves, etcetera.

On occasion, however, and because the cages are (literally) never cleaned out:

deadhenFace it, egg producers, chickens don’t care whether their eggs taste like wild onions or like cheap corn meal/flax seed mixes.  They lay them for the same reason that all birds lay eggs–because they are expecting to have offspring.

My thanks to Suicide Food for bringing the ridiculous attempts of the UEP to my attention.

The week in review

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Eating Animals

Many pieces appeared this past week about Eating Animals, the new book by Jonathan Safran Foer. There are some reviews and a few interviews. There was even a live Q and A with readers that appeared on the Washington Post website.

The Huffington Post: My Q and A With Jonathan Safran Foer

The Vegan Dietician: Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer: Some of My Favorite Reviews

On the Eating Animals forums, someone posted that he was inspired by Eating Animals to go vegan, and he chronicling his journey on his new blog: I Quit Eating Meat. Check it out and offer some support!

Striking at the Roots: The Power of Storytelling

Vegan Etsy: Eating Animals: All or Nothing or Something Else – the second chapter of the new book by Jonathan Safran Foer

The Gothamist: Jonathan Safran Foer, Author

VegDaily: Jonathan Safran Foer NYC Book Signing Packs the House…And A Punch

Washington Post: Jonathan Safran Foer on ‘Eating Animals’

Washington Post: Jonathan Safran Foer’s animal farm

Vegan.com: Jonathan Safran Foer on Martha Stewart

Geoff Nicholson in The SF Chronicle: ‘Eating Animals,’ by Jonathan Safran Foer

Pig farm investigation

There was a whole bunch of coverage around Mercy For Animals’ pig farm investigation.

Digging through the Dirt: Pig Video Too ‘Disturbing’ for Fox News

Discerning Brute: Bacon Bumption & The Pork Industry Shocker

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Undercover at the Pig Farm: This Is Where “Bacon” Comes From

Vegan.com: Pork Industry’s Pathetic Response to MFA Investigation

And in other news…

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Willful Slow Food Ignorance and the Pain Animals Feel

New York Times: Going Vegetarian for Thanksgiving

Glenn Gaetz in the Georgia Straight blogs: A little bit of veal is in every glass of milk

Digging through the Dirt: Game Gives Kids Distorted Glimpse of Dairy

Forbes: Drop That Burger

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Compassionate Giving Does Not Involve Cruelty to Goats

Stanley Park petting zoo likely to close

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009
photo from flickr user chest-hare

photo from flickr user chest-hare

In the Vancouver Sun today, there is an article about the Vancouver Park Board’s efforts to cut costs. Stanley Park houses the “children’s farmyard” which is a pretty standard example of a petting zoo, with small animals chased around and mishandled by loud children. Not exactly the happiest place for the animals.

One of the cost-cutting measures the Park Board will likely take is to close the petting zoo.

She noted the Children’s Farmyard has long been a drain on the park board finances. Although it attracts more than 150,000 visitors a year, its operation is subsidized by about $160,000 annually.

I had no idea that our taxes were subsidizing such a thing, and to such an extent.

Woodcock expects it will take at least four months before the farmyard is shut down as the park board wants to ensure it finds homes for all the animals, which include llamas, goats, chickens, rabbits and hamsters. “We have some rare breeds here,” she said. “They aren’t your standard critters.”

These “critters” never deserved to be on display for children to paw at. I can’t even imagine how terrifying that must have been for the chickens, rabbits, and hamster especially. All of these animals a frightened easily by loud noises and don’t like to be picked up.

There are no valuable lessons to be taught to children at a petting zoo. It only teaches that animals belong in zoos, on concrete, caged, for our amusement. I’ll be glad to see it close.

New report on the long-term effects of food poisoning

Monday, November 16th, 2009

The Center for Foodborne Illness Research and Prevention just released a report entitled “Health Outcomes of Selected Foodborne Pathogens (PDF).” It details the known health effects of the five most common foodborne pathogens.

Foodborne disease is a serious public health issue that, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), causes tens of millions of acute illnesses, hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations, and thousands of deaths each year in the United States. While the severity of acute foodborne disease varies greatly, depending on the pathogen and the vulnerability of the person infected, the impact of foodborne illness on children, as well as for the elderly and immune- suppressed (e.g., pregnant women, people undergoing chemotherapy, organ-transplant recipients, HIV/AIDS patients), is more likely to be serious and/or long-lasting.

The primary source of these pathogens is animal agriculture: meat, egg, and dairy production. In the small percentage of cases where vegetables were the source, the pathogens likely entered the food supply via contamination from animals. Any serious work to reduce the numbers of people affected by food poisoning is going to have to think hard about reforming our agricultural system, reducing the number of animals that are farmed, and encouraging a drastic reduction in meat consumption.

What’s all the hype about calcium in dairy?

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

I was messing around with Wolphram|Alpha today doing some nutritional comparisons of different foods. Here’s the result of the query “calcium 1 cup milk vs 1 cup tofu“:

Calcium in 1 cup of milk vs 1 cup of tofu

Calcium in 1 cup of milk vs 1 cup of tofu

This is pretty astonishing. I never see anything in the milk  ads or on dairy websites that would indicate that tofu has more calcium than milk. They always just say that milk is the best source of calcium. Tofu’s even a better source of iron.

But, you say, the calcium in milk is more easily absorbed by our bodies? Perhaps not. I looked around and found this chart of calcium bioavailability (how readily absorbable it is by our bodies) of different foods from the Linus Pauling Institue at Oregon State University. Note that the serving sizes of the different foods are all much smaller than the serving size of milk. For example, 8 oz of milk is 227 grams, while 1/2 cup of tofu is only 130 grams. That makes the serving of milk almost twice the size of the serving of tofu. 130 grams of tofu is a bit less than 1/2 a package of tofu, while 8 oz of milk is a full glass of milk.

Bioavailability of calcium in different foods

Bioavailability of calcium in different foods

You might notice that 1.2 servings of tofu has the same amount of bioavailable calcium as 1 serving of milk. And that serving of milk is a bit larger than the serving of tofu. You might also see that Chinese cabbage has the same amount of bioavailable calcium as 1 serving of milk. Considering that 1 serving of Chinese cabbage is smaller than 1 serving of milk, this means that Chinese cabbage has more calcium than milk.

So, why does everyone promote milk as such a great source of calcium, when there are better sources? It’s a mystery to me (although I’d bet it involves substantial influence by the dairy industry on universities and agencies that study nutrition). Dairy production has a far greater impact on the environment and animal suffering than either tofu production or Chinese cabbage farming, so it really doesn’t make sense that this information isn’t more readily available.

I also came across this chart on the “Dairy Goodness” website (a production of the ubiased folks over at the Dairy Farmers of Canada).

The calcium contained in selected sources in decreasing order of the amount absorbed by the body.

The calcium contained in selected sources in decreasing order of the amount absorbed by the body.

Here’s the tricky part: notice that they order the chart by column 5 “Calcium absorbed (mg).” But also note that the serving of milk is twice the size of the serving size of the rest of the foods.  They also don’t mention tofu, of course! This chart is an example of misinformation – an effort by the dairy industry to skew the facts available to make milk look like the best choice, when in fact it is not. A clear case of “whitewashing” (pun intended).

Also, with so many easy and more nutritious alternatives, is there any excuse to support the dairy industry, which directly causes the veal industry and the horrors detailed below?

Listen to Animal Voices on Co-op Radio

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

You may not know this, but Vancouver has an animal rights radio show.

Airing every Friday at noon on Co-op Radio, Animal Voices presents news, interviews, and editorials about human use of animals. The show’s been on for about 8 years (I think) and Liberation BC has recently become involved with it. Joanne has taken on the hosting role, along with Alison Cole, Christa Truman (of Veganmania fame), and John Pranger. They’re trying to introduce a more dynamic and approachable format with more broad appeal.

This past week they interviewed Pat Tohill of WSPA about the Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare and Dr. Michael Fox about swine flu vaccines and the origins of this disease in animals.

Christa did a nice segment on living vegan on a budget, which had some great tips like planning your meals and shopping in advance to make your shopping trips more efficient. We’re looking forward to hearing future segments (and she’s promised to bring in her vegan children one of these weeks to be on the show).

If you haven’t ever listened to the show, tune in to 102.7 FM on Friday and check it out. You can also listen online.

Reading from the past week

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Here, in no particular order (except possibly accidentally chronological) is a highlight of some of the articles I’ve read around the internet this past week. There’s a lot about Eating Animals, which I imagine will be in the news (especially animal rights news) for some time yet to come (right now it’s #49 on Amazon.ca, #51 on Amazon.com, and #14 on the NYT hardcover nonfiction bestseller list).

Enjoy!

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: Jonathan Safran Foer and Eating and Killing Animals

Vegan Soapbox: Where Jonathan Safran Foer Gets It Wrong

Vegan.com: Wall to Wall Eating Animals Coverage

The Discerning Brute: Ginnifer Goodwin stars in PSAs for Farm Sanctuary, produced by Joshua Katcher

V for Vegan: Intersectionality ‘Round the Interwebs, No. 11: Battered, Bruised & Consumed

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: The Underestimated Compassion and Understanding of Children

Huffington Post: Children’s Health And The Meat Industry

LA Times: Healthy Vegetarian Kids

Digging through the Dirt: Pigs to Get Swine-Flu Vaccine

Peta University of Utah Lab Investigation (troubling treatment of research animals, including animals purchased from local shelters.)

Animal Person: On Not Eating Animals

Animal Blawg: The Pig, The CAFO, & The Flu (Links to some great stories about pigs, plus the cutest pig picture you’ve ever seen.)

Peter Fricker: Pharmaceutical cruelty in your ham sandwich

Animal Person: On Peaceable Kingdom, Part Deux

Family farms are factory farms

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Today Erik Marcus wrote a post about a pig farm company in North Carolina that has declared bankruptcy. The”farm,” Coharie Hog Farms, is the 22nd largest pork producer in the United States, with 33,000 sows. The original news story states that “the company remains held in family hands.”

Some people like to say “family farms, not factory farms,” but in reality factory farms and factory farms are not opposites. Many farms are family-owned, but still large-scale operations that confine animals indoors, in pens, and don’t allow them to engage in ordinary, natural behaviours. “Family farms” vs. “factory farms” is really a false dichotomy.

Canada signs on to the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare

Monday, November 9th, 2009

This past Friday the Canadian Parliament voted to support the Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare (UDAW).

From The Province:

In a rare move, federal MPs have voted unanimously for a private member’s motion in support of a Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare — essentially agreeing that animal welfare is important.

The motion calls on Canada to support development of animal-welfare declarations at all relevant international organizations and forums.

Remember, though, that these are the same people who voted unanimously to request that seal skin be a part of the official 2010 Canadian Olympic uniform. I think the motion to sign on to the UDAW was done because it really doesn’t do anything to improve the lives of animals.

Again from The Province:

Organizers say that by establishing the status of animal welfare as an international issue of concern, it will:

- Provide a basis for animal-welfare legislation in countries where it does not already exist;

- Encourage governments to improve their national animal-welfare legislation;

- Recognize the reality of animal welfare as a key factor in humanitarian and environmental policy making;

- Encourage those industries that use animals to keep their welfare at the forefront of their policies;

- Improve public awareness of the importance of animal welfare; and

- Inspire positive change in public attitudes toward animals.

This motion could help to raise awareness about animals in general, bringing more attention to the idea that animals are worthy of our concern. But, practically speaking, it doesn’t do anything directly or immediately to improve animal welfare. There are no laws or requirements that necessarily come out of this.

Just about every organization of farmers (Chicken Farmers of Canada, Canadian Pork Council, etc) has a statement about animal welfare on their website. Saying that animal welfare is important and a focus for an organization (be it a government, coalition of farms, or a single farm) is easy and doesn’t really cost anything. But making real changes and doing what’s best for the animals involved does cost a great deal of money and would change the way these people do business.

I am cautiously optimistic that this vote, combined with other items in the public eye these days (Food, Inc., the HSUS veal slaughterhouse investigation, the publication and coverage of Eating Animals), might get people thinking more about the intrinsic value and concerns of these animals we call “food.”