animals in captivity

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Another Death at the Vancouver Aquarium

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

If you live in Vancouver, you’re probably aware that Nala, the baby beluga born last year at the Aquarium, has died.  Every time this sort of thing happens, it reopens the debate about keeping such intelligent, complicated animals in captivity–as it surely should.  Cetaceans don’t do well in captivity.  They never have.  According to Lifeforce, this is the 36th such death at the Aquarium since it opened in 1964.  That’s a pretty condemning track record.

Nala died because two rocks and a penny got stuck in her airway.  She was less than a  year old.  Our own Glenn Gaetz wrote an article about this latest tragedy at the Examiner.com.  Be sure to check it out and leave a comment!

From the Province:

The aquarium’s marine mammal curator, Brian Sheehan, said there are signs warning against throwing objects into aquarium pools. But none were obvious around the beluga pool when The Province did a quick search on Tuesday.

Yep.

The True Story of the Stanley Park Swans

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

If you’ve spent any time at the Lost Lagoon in Stanley Park, you’ve almost definitely seen the Mute Swans.  They are large, strikingly lovely birds, and certainly one of the most memorable and defining aspects of the lagoon.

Did you know, however, that they aren’t a native species to the Park or even to the continent?  Mute Swans actually come from Europe and Asia.  To prevent the birds from spreading and becoming an invasive species, their wings are clipped:

The swans are pinioned (wing tendons clipped) to keep this introduced species from spreading to other parts of the province.  Unlike clipped wings, it is a permanent surgery.  Some may find this cruel but it is the only way to ensure that a non-native species does not spread.  (Stanley Park Ecology Society)

That’s right, the swans cannot fly, and never will.  They are essentially captives–living decorations for visitors to the park to enjoy. Yes, some DO find this cruel.  In fact, I’d go so far as to say that most people would.  I know that I’ll never forget the day that I saw one of the swans desperately struggling to take off from the water.  Destroying the birds’ wings did not destroy their desire to fly.

The fact that the swans are denied their right to fly is  only one problem associated with their damaged wings, actually.  The birds are injured–or more often, killed–with surprising frequency, generally because they can only escape danger by staying on the Lagoon.  They cannot take to the air.  Despite warnings posted throughout the area, people very often unleash their dogs and allow them to run around freely.  I suspect that these are the same people who take their dogs, unleashed, for walks throughout our busy city, foolishly assuming that they know well enough how the dogs will react in every single situation.  The swans, who are very slow on land, cannot escape when a dog decides to express its natural instincts and attack.  It happens all the time.

Wild animals, like raccoons and coyotes, have also attacked the birds, and so have humans.  A few years ago, some idiot threw a large rock at a mother swan on her nest, breaking her leg.  Another swan and her babies were intentionally doused with oil.  (Two of the three cygnets died as a result.)  People who, again, ignore signs, have killed swans by riding their bikes too quickly on paths around the lagoon.

Right now there are close to 10 swans living on the lagoon, and even the park admits that this is too many:

There are also, technically, too many swans on the Lagoon.  In the wild, only one pair would inhabit a lake this size… (SPES)

Let there be no misunderstanding here: I love Stanley Park, and I love the Lost Lagoon.  I think it’s one of the best places in our wonderful city.  But the swans should be considered an embarrassment to the otherwise fantastic park.  It’s not as if we’re lacking for wildlife–the park and lagoon are home to literally hundreds of species of animals, including Great Blue Herons and Bald Eagles.  With such fascinating creatures living and flourishing freely in the park, why do we need captive swans?

Learn more from Stanley Park Swans.  The author is clearly in favour of the swans being in the lagoon, but the website is otherwise a great resource.

Friday’s Animal Voices Radio Show

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

So, are you listening yet?

Okay, so I’m a little biased–the hosts are Liberation BC’s very own Joanne Chang, as well as VeganMania’s Christa Trueman and Alison Cole of Earthsave.  But it’s seriously an entertaining show and a great resource for animal advocates.

The first guest was Karen Levenson, of the Toronto-based Animal Alliance.  The topic of discussion, the Canadian commercial seal hunt, always comes up around this time of year, of course.  Levenson brought up the fact that the seal hunt is a dying industry.  Very few people are making any money from it, least of all the hunters, and overall it’s costing Canada quite a bit to defend what is basically a national embarrassment.  We chose to invest hundreds of millions of dollars to (unsuccessfully) stop the EU ban on seal products; instead, we could have used it to help train and transfer seal hunters into an industry that isn’t already on its way out.  She also discussed the impressive effect of the Canadian seafood ban that so many restaurateurs–many of them top chefs–and individuals have agreed to.

In Canada, the ban is on seafood harvested in the eastern part of the country.  One might think that we can get all the fish we want in BC’s coastal waters, but the truth is that with seafood shortages occurring all over the world, we can’t guarantee that we always will.

The show’s next guest was Jason Hribal, author of Fear of the Animal Planet: The Hidden History of Animal Resistance. A discussion of this book is particularly appropro after a trainer at Sea World was killed by a captive orca last week.  In this book–which I’ll admit sounds fascinating–Hribal counters the idea that animals are willing, dumb, and docile captives; instead, as history shows us, plenty of them are actively fighting back.

Joanne pointed out that the recent attack of Tillicum received a great deal of attention because it occurred in front of an audience, and asked whether similar incidents happen more often than we hear about.  Hribal said that they definitely do, and listed a number of attacks, many of which I didn’t know about.  He also brought up the idea that in some situations, the animals have warned us–whales who have intentionally and repeatedly injuring trainers and spectators until finally (and again, with clear intent) killing one.

Would you believe that the head of the Vancouver Aquarium has suggested that orcas are incapable of conscious thought, and couldn’t possibly do this?  I’m not terribly impressed with his professional opinion that these mammals, who have been proven time and time again to be surprisingly intelligent and complicated, are only slightly more capable of emotion and thought than a robot.  But then, that’s why he’s in favour of keeping animals in cages, I guess.  It doesn’t say much for his interest in ensuring that they’re happy or entertained, though, does it?  (The Vancouver Aquarium does not have any orcas left, as far as I know, but they do have dolphins and some other large marine mammals.)

The assumption that whales couldn’t ever intend to hurt people–that they’re playing or that it was an accident–is also an altogether dangerous statement.  Park managers and other officials have been insisting upon it for some time, even as trainers and employees, who presumably know their animals far better, abandon their jobs out of concern for personal safety.  This refusal to upset the profit margin of the park has often had injurious and sometimes fatal results.

Anyway, next week’s guest is apparently going to be the producer of the new Peaceable Kingdom.  If you managed to see the first Peaceable Kingdom while it was out, you can understand why everyone is so excited about this upcoming release!

Be sure to tune in if you can!  Animal Voices airs every Friday from noon to 1 pm on Co-op Radio 102.7 FM.

Killer Whale Kills Trainer

Monday, March 1st, 2010

From the Huffington Post:

A killer whale attacked and killed a trainer in front of a horrified audience at a SeaWorld show Wednesday, with witnesses saying the animal involved in two previous deaths dragged the trainer under and thrashed her around violently. Distraught audience members were hustled out of the stadium, and the park was immediately closed.

Obviously, this is a very sad accident.  What makes it particularly sad is how very avoidable it was.  The whale, Tilikum, had been involved in two deaths before, one in 1991 and one in 1999.  And he wasn’t the only marine mammal to suddenly turn on his trainer, even in the last decade:

In November 2006, a trainer was bitten and held underwater several times by a killer whale during a show at SeaWorld’s San Diego park.The trainer, Kenneth Peters, escaped with a broken foot. The 17-foot orca that attacked him was the dominant female of SeaWorld San Diego’s seven killer whales. She had attacked Peters two other times, in 1993 and 1999.

In 2004, another whale at the company’s San Antonio park tried to hit one of the trainers and attempted to bite him. He also escaped.

In December, a whale drowned a trainer at a Spanish zoo.

Then there was the July 1999 incident at the Orlando SeaWorld, when the body of a naked man was found draped over Tilikum.

Daniel Dukes reportedly made his way past security and remained in the park after it had closed. Wearing only his underwear, he ended up in the frigid water of Tilikum’s huge tank.

We should have seen this coming.

An orca in the wild.

Animals in entertainment are very often abused to make them perform.  (The circus is particularly infamous when it comes to this.) I have no idea whether this is the case at Sea World.  All accounts indicate that Dawn Brancheau, the trainer who was killed, truly loved the whales in her care.  But even if the whales are treated well, given lots of pats and treats and praise, they remain enormous and extremely intelligent wild animals who are expected to exist for their entire lives in a small tank.  And that’s abuse, regardless of how much you claim to love them.

(The connection between Sea World and our very own Vancouver Aquarium.)

I can totally understand the draw of Sea World, particularly for animal lovers.  Some of my very earliest childhood memories involve trips to small, local dolphin shows on the east coast.  The dolphins were named Dottie and (I think) Daisy, and because I loved animals, I loved seeing them perform.  I had no idea that they were very likely frustrated and unhappy.  The point is that now that I know better, I will not be visiting Sea World.  I will not be visiting the Vancouver Aquarium or the zoo.  Whatever joy it brings us to see these animals with our own eyes is not more important than the rights of the animals themselves–and they have the right to be free.

Learn more about captive marine animals at the Vancouver-based No Whales in Captivity.

Link soup

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Here are some posts and articles from the past week or so. Enjoy!

A few posts about backyard chickens:

Farm Sanctuary backyard chicken action alert (with link to coalition position statement on backyard chickens)

Making Hay (Farm Sanctuary): Backyard Chickens, a Sad Fad

Sanctuary Tails (Farm Sanctuary): The High Price of Fresh Eggs

Animal Place Sanctuary: Backyard chicken redux

Local (and sort-of-local) news

Karmavore Vegan Shop: Fundraising Event a Success

Vancouver Sun: Vancouver student calls for ban on shark-fin soup

Calgary zoo under scrutiny after another animal dies

Animal Blawg: The Voiceless Toolkit Can Now Be Yours

And more…

USA Today: Fast-food standards for meat top those for school lunches

Vegan.com: New CNN Segment on HSUS Downer Pigs Investigation

Easyvegan.info: Intersectionality ‘Round the Interwebs, No. 12: The Wordy Vegan

NPR: New Mexico Dairy Pollution Sparks ‘Manure War’

Change.org Animal Rights Blog: God Sent This Calf to Convince You to Kill the Others

The Atlantic: Jonathan Safran Foer on the Morality of Vegetarianism

Tha Guardian: Eat less meat and dairy: official recipe to help health of consumers – and the planet

Stanley Park petting zoo likely to close

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009
photo from flickr user chest-hare

photo from flickr user chest-hare

In the Vancouver Sun today, there is an article about the Vancouver Park Board’s efforts to cut costs. Stanley Park houses the “children’s farmyard” which is a pretty standard example of a petting zoo, with small animals chased around and mishandled by loud children. Not exactly the happiest place for the animals.

One of the cost-cutting measures the Park Board will likely take is to close the petting zoo.

She noted the Children’s Farmyard has long been a drain on the park board finances. Although it attracts more than 150,000 visitors a year, its operation is subsidized by about $160,000 annually.

I had no idea that our taxes were subsidizing such a thing, and to such an extent.

Woodcock expects it will take at least four months before the farmyard is shut down as the park board wants to ensure it finds homes for all the animals, which include llamas, goats, chickens, rabbits and hamsters. “We have some rare breeds here,” she said. “They aren’t your standard critters.”

These “critters” never deserved to be on display for children to paw at. I can’t even imagine how terrifying that must have been for the chickens, rabbits, and hamster especially. All of these animals a frightened easily by loud noises and don’t like to be picked up.

There are no valuable lessons to be taught to children at a petting zoo. It only teaches that animals belong in zoos, on concrete, caged, for our amusement. I’ll be glad to see it close.

Beautiful Prisoners

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

A swan on Lost Lagoon

Many people enjoy seeing all the birds at Lost Lagoon in Stanley Park here in Vancouver, the swans in particular.

But I was troubled to learn that the swans are not there because they like the lake, but because they are kept there. They all have their wing tendons clipped so that they can’t fly away. This makes them prisoners in their own homes.

As the ducks and geese come and go, the swans are unable to fly anywhere. Because more swans are kept on the lake than would be possible in the wild, they are fed by the park authorities each morning. In nature, only one pair of swans would live on a lake this size.

It is wonderful to see swans, but now that I know that they are not there by choice, I don’t think I can enjoy seeing them anymore. Now they’ll just make me sad, like any imprisonment of animals (i.e. the nearby aquarium).

Most of my information for this post comes from the Stanley Park Ecological Society website.