eggs

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Spent Chickens in School Lunches

Friday, January 8th, 2010

Remember how when you were in school, everyone made fun of how horrible the cafeteria food was?  At my school, at least, there was a rumour that our food was grade F, and that prisoners received grade D.

Regardless of how true that is, there’s a reason that school food sucks.

It’s this:

This is what we're feeding to schoolchildren.

USA Today just reported that over the past eight years, the government has handed the egg industry $145 million taxpayer dollars for flesh that would probably otherwise be turned into pet food or compost.” (Vegan.com)

That’s right, after the chickens have basically laid eggs to the point of death–usually at around 1 1/2 to 2 years of age (they can live between 10 and 15 years normally)–they are considered “spent” and basically thrown away.  (It’s the same in the organic and free range industry, incidentally.)  There was a fairly famous case in which a farm in California killed 15,000 spent hens by tossing them live into a wood chipper; though cruelty charges were raised against the farm, they were dropped because it was proven to be “common industry practice.”  (You can read more about this case at our page here.)

The bodies of spent hens are so weak, bruised, and depleted that their meat is almost useless; in the true spirit of the industry, of course, there’s always something to do with it.  Usually it goes into soup, pot pies, baby food, and any other product that easily hides bruising–low quality meat products, basically.  And school lunches.

Eat up, kids.

Lies of the Egg Industry

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

It’s no secret that, having researched “free range” and “organic” farming, I am less than impressed and feel that most consumers have been thoroughly deceived as to what such terms mean. Most people aren’t aware that “cage-free” chickens usually can’t go outside, that “free range” has no legal meaning, and again, doesn’t require that chickens have access to the outdoors, or that even “organic”, which is the highest standard there is, requires routine mutilation and death.  (More here.)

That said, do I believe that it is better to live like this…

freerangeeggs

…than like this?

Battery_Cage_01

Of course I do.  Both types of farming result in considerable and unnecessary suffering for the animals involved, but one is obviously worse than the other.  Most reasonably sane people will be able to agree on this last point.

That brings us to the United Egg Producers, who, like most egg producers on the North American continent, are very concerned with keeping chickens in battery cages.  Why is that?  Because they CARE about chickens.  Who knew?

freerange-uep2Witness the profound absurdity of a company insisting that free-range chickens, who in the very best of circumstances, DO go outside, won’t have any form of shelter and will have to stand around in the rain.

"I miss my warm dry cage, Dolly!"

"I miss my warm dry cage, Dolly!"

Same thing with this brilliant attempt at fooling the public.  Message to the public: apparently egg producers think you are unbelievably stupid.

freerange-uep1Apparently egg producers also think chickens are unbelievably stupid, and will stand around waiting to get picked off by predators.  I guess they haven’t read the studies which demonstrate that chickens actually have different ways to communicate where a predator is coming from, as well as how much of a threat it is.

One more:

freerange-uep3As if chickens lay their eggs for us to eat.  Even life in a battery cage does not destroy the chicken’s desire to create a nest for the babies she expects to have.  Because battery cages are entirely barren, however, they don’t generally have anything to build with–no straw, sticks, leaves, etcetera.

On occasion, however, and because the cages are (literally) never cleaned out:

deadhenFace it, egg producers, chickens don’t care whether their eggs taste like wild onions or like cheap corn meal/flax seed mixes.  They lay them for the same reason that all birds lay eggs–because they are expecting to have offspring.

My thanks to Suicide Food for bringing the ridiculous attempts of the UEP to my attention.

Dear Vancouver, backyard chickens are a bad idea

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

We already have issues with unwanted dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, turtles, llamas, chinchillas, tropical birds, and the list just goes on and on. Introducing another kind of animal that will be part pet, part food source will likely mean bad things for the chickens themselves. Why, in this whole question of whether we should be allowed to keep backyard chickens, does no one consider the implications for the chickens?

Marji at Animal Place posted a blog today about this very issue. She writes:

Chickens are wonderful animals. They’re fascinating and engaging. They form bonds and friendships, have preferences and desires of their own. We believe they can become wonderful companions. We do not believe the backyard chicken phenomenon is turning out to be in the best interest of the birds or people. That is not to say we oppose the adoption of chickens, we whole-heartedly support anyone’s efforts at providing an appropriate and permanent home to abandoned birds.

In her post she quotes from an article by Kim Severson which appeared in yesterday’s New York Times, which looks at the problems with urban chickens in the Bay Area. Severson writes: “Unwanted urban chickens are showing up at local animal shelters. Even in the best of circumstances, chickens die at alarming rates.”

But with increased chicken popularity comes a downside: abandonment. In one week earlier this month, eight were available for adoption at the Oakland shelter and five were awaiting homes at the San Francisco shelter. In Berkeley, someone dropped four chickens in the animal control night box with a note from their apologetic owner, said Kate O’Connor, the manager.

I wonder if the Vancouver supporters have considered the negatives of backyard chickens. Is there any way to guarantee that chickens will be well-cared for and won’t be abandoned or simply slaughtered when they stop producing eggs? Will people understand that buying chickens from a breeder simply perpetuates a system that kills unwanted birds (especially roosters) and that is as cruel, if not worse, than the worst puppy mills?

When the city council voted to allow backyard hens in Vancouver many animal protection groups in Vancouver opposed the motion. Not a single animal protection group supported it. There may be a few people who do a wonderful job caring for their pet chickens, but many more chickens will suffer as a result, and a new cottage industry of breeding chickens for sale to urbanites will have been created.

It’s about time we started thinking past the latest fads of local food or sketchy ideas of “food security” and really begin to care for our fellow residents of this planet. It’s the only decent thing to do.

Sincerely,

Glenn

ps. I was looking at the nutritional content of an egg, and 1 cup of peas has more protein and more iron than 1 egg. Plus more other vitamins and a whole lot less cholesterol. It’s healthier for us and for the chickens to eat a plant-based diet.

A Trip to the PNE, Part Two: the Lies

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

In the first part of this blog post, I ended by mentioning that my co-volunteer, Joanne, had asked one of the attendants about the mother of the hundreds of baby chicks.  Well, what answer did she receive?  Not the truth, certainly: the attendant informed her that the mother chicken was “at the farm”.

A few of the hundreds of chicks at the fair.

A few of the hundreds of chicks at the fair.

This isn’t true, of course; the attendant forgot one crucial word–”factory”.  That’s right, she was from a factory farm.  Unlike most of the vendors at the fair, who dropped their names at every opportunity, the chicks had no source whatsoever.  This leads me to believe that the chicks are likely from a generic, local factory farm, and will probably end up at the slaughterhouse/processing plant at Hastings and Commercial Drive.

The attendant also forgot to mention that there isn’t one mother chicken, but many, and none of them will ever see their babies born.  Here is more info on the spectacularly horrifying life of the broiler breeder chicken, who will live her life intentionally starved and in the dark, crowded in with thousands and thousands of other birds.

Oh, and they had a sign at each of the crates of chicks.  It stated that the chicks…

…belong to a commercial breed of chicken…bred mainly for meat.  …This breed grows very fast and by the time they are 40 days old they weigh 40 lbs.

Admittedly, these aren’t outright lies, but they’ve left a few things out.  Let me help:

…[these chicks] belong to a commercial breed of chicken…bred mainly for meat.  …This breed grows very fast as a result of genetic manipulation and by the time they are 40 days old they weigh 40 lbs.  That’s right–these chicks, which you are all gushing about and petting, will be they slaughtered in just over a month.   Many of them will not make it that long.  Due to their unnnaturally fast growth, some of them will die when their hearts or lungs fail or their bones break under their immense weight.

Gee, I can’t see why they left that part out.  Learn more here.  And here’s a relevant video from Compassion Over Killing:

45 Days: the Life and Death of a Broiler Chicken

There was also a section of the fair called the Kidz Discovery Farm, and it was perhaps the worst part of the entire fair.  There, children could wander through a fake farm, helpfully provided by the BC Egg Marketers Board and the BC Milk Producers Association.  First up was the Egg Barn.  Here’s what it looked like on the inside:

Look, honey!  Battery cages aren't so bad after all!

Look, honey! Battery cages aren't so bad after all!

Wait a second…that doesn’t look anything like any battery cage I’ve ever seen.  There are one or two birds in every cage…and some of them are just hanging out on top!  They’ve even got nice, straw bedding!  I guess battery cages are pretty okay!  Oh, wait.

Battery_Cage_01

Hey...

One more time.  A PNE battery cage farm:

Hey...

Fake.

Well, that looks pretty good!  Oh wait, what’s this?

Real.

Real.

The next exhibit was the Dairy Barn.  Here’s what it looked like:

Cozy.

Sorry about this.

Admittedly, this is a lousy shot.  But you can see in the forefront the wooden cow, which children could “milk”.  In the back is a view of an industrial dairy farm.  Even while in the barn, you could barely make out the cows in the picture.  There was also a bucket with free pints of milk for the 60% of the population who don’t get sick (well, not as a result of lactose intolerance) from consuming dairy products–which I forgot to get a shot of.

Barn 3 was the “Beef Barn”, which for whatever reason was strangely empty during the period that I was there.  I don’t know if it was the location or if most parents were less-than-eager for their children to make the connection between the cuddly baby cows at the fair and the rubber hamburgers you could pick up in the barn.

Seriously, the other barns were packed.

Seriously, the other barns were packed.

There was also a section were you could pick up plastic vegetables, but there wasn’t much to it–probably because the fruit and vegetable council wasn’t a major sponsor of the event.

So there you have it: my trip to the PNE.  Sigh.

A Trip to the PNE, Part 1: the Abuse

Monday, September 14th, 2009

I went to the PNE last week, specifically the Agrifair bit.  I can sort the problematic issues with the Agrifair into two fairly neat categories: the first involves some unsurprising animal abuse.  The second was actually far more troubling.  I’ll get to that in a bit.

First, the abuse.  Here is a photo of the hocks of one of the dairy cows:

Sores on the hocks of a dairy cow.  These are caused by insufficient bedding.

Sores on the hocks of a dairy cow.

As you can see, there are strange sores on the cow’s legs.  There were three or four other cows chained nearby, and oddly enough, they all had identical sores.  You can probably guess why: when they aren’t at the PNE, they aren’t resting on piles of straw.  I wrote to an organic dairy to ask their opinion, and they helpfully confirmed what I was thinking, stating that “the cow in the picture has sore ‘hocks’ and the likely cause is insufficient bedding”.  (Note: obviously I am not in favor of any kind of dairies,  since the system itself requires unnecessary suffering–but organic dairies are more likely in general to be concerned with animal welfare. Learn more about organic, “humane” animal products here.)

Here’s another fun shot.  It’s of a calf, two days old, and born at the fair.  There were six or seven other calves, all less than a few weeks old, and already separated from their mothers.  Not only that–they were all separated from one another as well.

A lone two day old calf.

A lonely two day old calf.

Now, if you know much about the dairy industry–organic or not–you’re aware that calves tend to be taken from their mothers at a very young age so that we can drink their milk.  You might also know that cows are very social animals.  When allowed to, they are form friendships that last throughout their entire lives.  The relationships that cows form with their babies is no different; in fact, when the female calves grow up and give birth themselves, the proud grandmother is there to help her offspring care for her new baby.

I think you can guess what my opinion is of the PNE’s decision to not only take such young animals away from their mothers–almost definitely permanently–but to separate them from each other.  I also have to wonder what the fate of these calves will be.  Will they become veal? Will they be raised for beef, or to be dairy cows themselves?  Will they simply be discarded?  Such is the fate of calves born to dairy cows.

Here’s another example of something troubling.  In the poultry section, I came across this exhibition of Norwich Croppers:

A sick pigeon.

A sick pigeon.

Being a pigeon enthusiast (learn more about what makes these birds so fascinating) I was disturbed by the appearance of this particular bird.  You can probably tell that he doesn’t look well.  I still wasn’t sure, though, so I contacted the Canadian Pigeon Fanciers Association.  Here is part of the response I received: “Yes in this picture this pigeon does look sick. I am not so concerned about the feathers as the dull listless look of the bird in the picture.”

We have no way to determine exactly what this pigeon was suffering from, but it is the responsibility not only of the pigeon’s breeder but the PNE to monitor the condition of these birds.   It is worth noting that pigeons, like most prey animals, generally do not reveal such obvious sickness until they are already quite ill.

There were also 12 or 15 roosters being exhibited in a series of very small cages.  They looked bored and unhappy, which should come as no shock to anyone who has spent much time around chickens.

Let me out!

Let me out!

In addition, about half of them had absolutely filthy water.  I contacted Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns about this, who stated that while though the cups were anchored to keep them from tipping over, they were not clean enough–that chickens should have “fresh, clean, clear water to drink at all times.”  I don’t want to rule out the possibility that an attendant would come through periodically to give the chickens fresh water, but from the looks of it, it wasn’t happening very often.

More wood chips in here than water.

One of many dirty water cups.

Next photo.  Yep, these are baby chicks, albeit a very small subsection of what were there.  There were, in fact, at least a hundred baby chicks in two open crates, all within a couple days of age, being heated by lamps and poked at by children.  There was even an incubation box, with eggs in it…some of which had just hatched.

Poke.

Poke.

Throughout this, there was a PNE attendant standing in each crate, picking up individual chicks and allowing children to pet them.

Poke.  Poke.

Poke. Poke.

Another LibBC volunteer, Joanne, asked the PNE attendant how long she would hold each individual chick while allowing children to pet them, and she told us that she usually holds them for 15 minutes each.  Can you imagine?

Joanne also asked the attendant where the chicks’ mother was…and that brings us to part 2 of my day at the PNE–the unbelievably pervasive lies.

The unavoidable tragedy of eggs

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Mercy for Animals recently (a couple of days ago) released video footage from an undercover investigation at the world’s largest egg-laying breed hatchery.The video shows what happens to the unwanted and unusable male chicks who are born (50% of all the chicks are male): they are ground up alive. The sad fact is that the male chicks are simply waste and must be discarded.

Watch the hatchery video

Watch the hatchery video

Most farms that produce eggs don’t have their own hatcheries, but instead buy from much larger hatcheries that supply them with day-old hens. According to the Canadian Poultry and Egg Producers Council there are 4 hatcheries in BC, and about 50 in Canada (this list includes all poultry hatcheries, not just egg layers). If you buy eggs, the chicken who laid your eggs almost definitely came from one of these hatcheries, all of which kill the male chicks of egg-layer breeds.

It’s unavoidable – eating eggs means killing the male chicks. If you buy eggs at a farmers market ask the farmer what happens to the male chicks. It’s a nasty part of the business that no one talks about.

Many stories have appeared about this investigation. Here’s a list of links if you want to learn more:

I’m sure there are more, but this is what I’ve come across in the past two days.

Do Californian chickens have rights?

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

In November 2008, Californians voted against the worst confinement systems in animal agriculture. An overwhelming 63% of voters gave permission to farm animals to turn around freely, lie down, stand up, and fully extend their limbs. The Proposition 2 victory is extremely important because it shows that the majority of the people do not approve of the current system of industrial animal agriculture. At the same time though, it is sad to think that we are declaring victory over the fact that millions of animals are now “liberated” by gaining a few inches of space inside their cages.

4751_86776639309_516524309_1666017_1916643_n1Coincidentally, during the same election, Proposition 8 was also passed, banning gay marriage in California. Living in Canada where gay marriage is as common and legal as non-gay marriage, the kerfuffle over this issue seems surreal. I don’t think I’m alone when I say I found the ballot initiative to be offensive and distasteful. And the fact that it passed served as a stinging reminder of the deep prejudice against LGBT people that is still very common. To me, this type of prejudice, like cruelty to animals, should never be tolerated.

The outcome of the election gave rise to the argument that chickens now have more rights than gays in California. But is that really true? Does Proposition 2 give RIGHTS to farm animals?

98% of all of our eggs come from this

98% of all of our eggs come from this

Today’s industrial farming system is so cruel that nothing else in history can compare. An egg laying hen spends her entire miserable life inside a small cage with 5-7 other inmates. She stands on a slanted wire-bottomed floor while being defecated on by other hens above her. A breeding sow, probably smarter than most dogs, is locked up in a cage so small that she is unable to take a step forward or backward. She stays like this for her entire life and goes insane from the extreme confinement and lack of mental stimulation.

Thanks to Prop 2, these animals will no longer have to endure the most extreme forms of confinement. But it is a far cry from having any rights.

This leads me to wonder what California would look like if chickens were actually granted rights. First off, chickens would not have to worry about being locked up, beaten, strung up, mutilated and murdered at 6 weeks of age – or EVER. And if they can talk, they would say “screw prop 2, I don’t just want more leg room, I want out of this cage and into an air conditioned sanctuary. And no one better steal any of my kids for no stinking breakfast sandwiches!”

For a chicken, the end is all the same

For a chicken, the end is all the same

But as it stands, even with the help of Prop 2, chickens have no rights. They are still treated more horribly than any slave in history. Can anyone truly and sincerely feel animosity towards chickens for getting a bit more leg room?

Almost Earth Day

Thursday, April 16th, 2009
Roger, Michelle, and me

Roger, Michelle, and me

On Wednesday we started our week-long “Meat Free Earth Day” campaign.

It’s a pretty low-key campaign this year. We started with a 1 hour launch event which went pretty well. The weather was great.

This afternoon we were out doing some rush hour leafleting. We gave away all of our leaflets in just an hour!  We’re going to be out tomorrow at Commercial Drive skytrain station, then again on Monday and Tuesday, in different locations.

The fun part comes on Earth Day, when we will be giving away free vegan mini cupcakes. I hope a lot of people come by to try the cupcakes.

Now, why are we doing all of this?

The evidence keeps mounting that animal agriculture (the production of meat, eggs, and dairy) is causing immense harm to our planet: pollution, climate change, rainforest destruction, errosion, desertification, and more.

One of the facts that blew me away was the fact that beef production is the leading cause of rainforest destruction.  Even Greenpeace has a campaign about this issue.

I also learned when doing research that it takes over 3,000 calories of fossil fuel energy to produce 1 egg, while it only takes about 160 calories of fossil fuel energy to produce a serving of tofu of the same calories. Eggs are as bad as beef! Another shocker is that cheese is about twice as bad as beef, largely because it takes so much milk (which comes from cows) to produce such a small amount of cheese.

Beef is already a massively inneficient food. Cheese is phenomenally bad. There is no way that anyone who is concerened about the environment should be eating cheese. One single serving of cheese is equal to a litre and a half of gasoline.

We’ve produced a new leaflet for the occasion. Download it and have a look.

We are hoping that many people will consider going meat-, egg-, and dairy-free this Earth Day, since it is the easiest and most effective thing we can do to help the environment.

“Guilt-free” eating

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

img_2940I was just browsing through my rss feeds (which I do way too often) and I noticed one blogger had written about a recipe that was “guiltless” because it was made with only egg whites, not the yolks.

I guess this means that it’s less fattening or has less cholesterol or something.

But it got me thinking. Why is it completely normal to feel guilty about eating something that is sugary or fattening? Where is the guilt about eating something that was produced by a hen packed into a cage for her entire life, possibly after having her beak cut off, and then sent off to slaughter when she was no longer economically viable?

It seems as if (and this is just my impression at this moment) there is a societal standard that indicates that we are ok in feeling guilty about something that would affect ourselves (too many pieces of cake might make me fat, smoking might kill me) but thinking about others is somewhat frowned upon.

I, for one, would feel far more guilt to be eating the body of another being or stealing their milk than I would eating a whole cake. In fact, I often do buy whole pies and eat them in one sitting. Wonderful thing about vegan foods, there’s very little guilt involved no matter how you look at it!

Oh right, it’s Easter!

Friday, April 10th, 2009

I was sitting here wondering what to write about, and I realized that it’s Easter this Sunday.

I was raised Christian and Easter was a big deal in our house. We would get up really early to go to the sunrise service (actually at sunrise). We also had easter baskets and painted easter eggs and ate way too much chocolate and sugar. But it was all fun.

Now I’m not religious so I don’t really pay much attention to Easter. At least, I wouldn’t if Easter didn’t promote some terrible animal abuse.

One of the really terrible ideas on Easter is to buy baby bunnies or chicks as gifts for children. For some reason, many people like to buy cute animals as gifts, without considering that these animals are a 10+ year committment. They don’t consider the needs of the animals, and often they end up in shelter or abandoned.

In Vancouver, drop-offs of rabbits at shelters increase a few months after easter, when parents start to realize that their children don’t want to play with their new “toy” anymore. Rabbits are not good pets for children, and should ever only be adopted, never purchased. Purchasing rabbits supports are horrible system of breeding that produces maqny unwanted animals in addition to the ones dropped off at shelters.

Also, rabbits are still commonly used in cosmetic and toxicity testing. If you use regular toothpaste, shampoo, soap, dish detergent, etc, chances are it was tested on animals. The only way to know for sure that your products are not tested on animals is to look for a third-party certified logo, like the “Leaping Bunny” logo.

In some cities, you can buy chicks, baby chickens, that have been dyed all sorts of easter colours. This is unhealthy for the chicks, and treats them as commodities. Chicks are cute for a few days, but then start to grow and need proper care and nutrition and habitat. Generally these chicks get abandoned or thrown away. Often they die from the aftereffects of the dye.

We also like to give and get cute little chocolates in the shape of bunnies and eggs. Most of the time, these are made with milk chocolate.

The dairy industry is one of the cruelest animal industries ever. Cows are artificially inseminated so that they will give birth once per year to produce milk. Their calves are taken away immediately. The male calves become a “delicacy” called veal. The calves are kept confined in little huts, unable to socialize or play like normal young calves would.

Most chocolate sold is not fair trade or organic, meaning that farmers were paid very little for it and it is often farmed in unsustainable ways. Trees are cut down to make space to grow chocolate. Whenever possible, look for fair-trade organic chocolate. Fair-trade means that it’s much more likely that the farmers were paid a decent amount for their crops, enough to feed their family and pay for education for their children.

Easter looks like it’s all about cuteness and bright colours and fun, but it’s really hiding a whole slew of terrible and completely avoidable cruelties. Please, this Easter, make compassionate choices that don’t harm others.